[ KEY POINTS FOR JURISDICTIONS]
FOR ANYONE WHO CONSIDERS LAUNCHING A SECURITY TOKEN OFFERING, CHOOSING THE RIGHT JURISDICTION IS CRUCIAL. EACH JURISDICTION OFFERS ITS OWN SET OF ADVANTAGES AND REGULATIONS. TO HELP YOU MAKE AN INFORMED DECISION, WE HAVE HIGHLIGHTED KEY POINTS FOR JURISDICTION A COMPARISON.
1. TRACTION FOR STO PROSPECTUSES FOR PUBLIC OFFERING: NEON EXCHANGE (NASH), EDEXA, CROWDLI, ICONOMI
2. SPECIAL LEGISLATION FOR BLOCKCHAIN PROJECTS: BLOCKCHAIN ACT
3. INVESTOR COUNTRIES COVERED: EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA USING PASSPORTING, SWITZERLAND WITHIN BILATERAL AGREEMENTS
4. STO BUDGET: APPROX. 20,000 CHF
5. LIMITS FOR CROWDFUNDING WITHOUT PROSPECTUS REGISTRATION: 8 MLN CHF
1. TRACTION FOR STO PROSPECTUSES FOR PUBLIC OFFERING: 10+ PROJECTS
2. SPECIAL LEGISLATION FOR BLOCKCHAIN PROJECTS:
DLT SECURITIES ACT
3. INVESTOR COUNTRIES COVERED:
SWITZERLAND
4. STO BUDGET: APPROX. 25,000 CHF
5. LIMITS FOR CROWDFUNDING WITHOUT PROSPECTUS REGISTRATION: 8 MLN CHF
IF YOU ARE UNDECIDED AS TO WHICH COUNTRY TO CHOOSE FOR AN STO, DOWNLOAD OUR CHECKLIST WITH THE KEY FACTORS FOR A COMPARISON OF JURISDICTIONS: SWITZERLAND VS. LIECHTENSTEIN